RESUMO
Background: The return to participation in meaningful life roles for persons with acquired brain injury (pwABI) is a goal shared by pwABI, their families, clinicians, and researchers. Synthesizing how pwABI define participation will help to identify the aspects of participation important to pwABI and can inform a person-centered approach to participation outcome assessment. To-date, the qualitative synthesis approach has been used to explore facilitators and barriers of participation post-stroke, and views about participation among individuals with stroke in the UK. Objectives: This paper's objectives are to (1) conduct a scoping review of qualitative literature that defines and characterizes participation from the perspective of pwABI of any type, (2) synthesize how pwABI define and categorize participation, and (3) link the themes identified in the qualitative synthesis to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) using standardized linking rules to enhance the comparability of our findings to other types of health information, including standardized outcome measures. Methods: We completed a scoping review of qualitative literature. Our search included PubMed, APA PsychInfo, CINAHL, and Embase databases and included articles that (1) had qualitative methodology, (2) had a sample ≥50% pwABI, (3) had aims or research questions related to the meaning, definition, perception, or broader experience of participation, and (4) were in English. Qualitative findings were synthesized using Thomas and Harden's methodology and resultant themes were linked to ICF codes. Results: The search identified 2,670 articles with 2,580 articles excluded during initial screening. The remaining 90 article abstracts were screened, and 6 articles met the full inclusion criteria for the qualitative synthesis. Four analytical themes emerged: (1) Essential Elements of Participation (2) How pwABI Approach Participation, (3) Where pwABI Participate, and (4) Outcomes of Participation. Each overarching theme included multiple descriptive themes. Conclusion: In this paper, we identified themes that illustrate key components of participation to pwABI. Our results provide insight into the complex perspectives about participation among pwABI and illustrate aspects of participation that should hold elevated importance for clinicians and researchers supporting participation of pwABI.
RESUMO
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are increasingly common and a major cause of death and long-term disability. Many individuals experience chronic stressors and adverse health outcomes, emphasizing the importance of cultivating resilience, (defined herein as individual, social, and systemic components engaged in response to the stressors that allow individuals to "bounce back," or move forward adaptively after TBI). Patients' perceptions of factors influencing resilience are critical to guide interventions that meet their needs. Here we offer the first metasynthesis of factors influencing resilience after TBI using a Social Ecological model framework. Research Methods/Design: We preregistered our metasynthesis on PROSPERO (CRD42021233975) and followed PRISMA guidelines. We searched 4 electronic databases for qualitative studies from inception up until June 2021. We included qualitative studies detailing perspectives of individuals with a history of moderate-severe TBI. We excluded case studies and systematic reviews. After removal of duplicates, we identified 124 articles for screening. We reviewed 49 articles for full text eligibility and included 38 studies. We extracted study characteristics and data (e.g., author interpretations and relevant quotes) relating to factors influencing resilience. RESULTS: We synthesized findings using a Social Ecological model framework to guide thematic analysis. Persons with TBI identified barriers and facilitators to resilience at individual (e.g., physical and cognitive challenges, coping behaviors), interpersonal, (e.g., stigma and isolation) and systemic (e.g., access to resources, rehabilitation support) levels. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Considering multifaceted factors at individual, interpersonal and systemic levels in clinical, research, and policy-setting contexts is important for cultivating resilience and optimizing recovery after TBI. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
